|
Join the Discussion
|
"Will the removal of public information online
really help to protect people from identity
theft?"
--Share
Your Opinions!
|
|
 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
 |
By Kimberly Powell
Update: 12/11/01
In a twist on the age-old debate - personal freedom versus right to privacy -
American government officials are now actively questioning whether citizens are
willing to curtail easy access to public information in exchange for greater
personal and national security. The news that the suspects in the September 11
terrorist attacks were able to get fake driver's licenses and other documents
from information obtained online has many state and federal government agencies scrambling to remove public
documents from the Internet.
One of the most recent
examples, one which has genealogists up in arms, was the decision by
major genealogy site RootsWeb.com to remove access to several public vital
records databases. One of the affected databases, an index of birth records
(1905-1995) from California, was originally sold to RootsWeb by the California
Department of Health Services and is a matter of public record. It is available
from many public libraries in the state of California as well as a variety of
online sources. "The index is a public record. We are compelled to provide that
information [under the California Public Records Act]," said Mike Rodrian, chief
of the DHS's center for health statistics. RootsWeb decided on Friday to remove
access to this database, however, after a state Senate hearing in Sacramento
drew attention to the Web site and infuriated Californians protested that their
privacy had been invaded. The California Birth Index provides information on
individuals born in the state of California between 1905 and 1995, including
name, birth date, place of birth and mother's maiden name. Other related
databases removed by RootsWeb include searchable indexes to Maine marriage records and
Texas birth, marriage and divorce records.
Similar controversies have surrounded the Social Security Death Master File which is publicly available
from the Social Security Administration (SSA) for a little under $1800. This
index includes access to personal identifiable information such as name, social
security number, birth date, death date and last known address for over 64
million Americans who have died (primarily since 1962). Many privacy advocates
fear that the easy accessibility of such information makes it simple for people
to take over the identity of recently deceased individuals as their own.
It is not just genealogy sites
under scrutiny, however. Passwords, users names, Social Security numbers,
driver's license information and mother's maiden names - data often used by
financial and government institutions to verify identity - are all readily
accessible in a myriad of databases - both online and off. It doesn't take much
given today's lax security restrictions. With just a name and address some
people have even managed to file a change of address notice with the U.S. Postal
Service, and have had mail full of identifying information, such as bills, IRS
notices, paychecks, etc. forwarded to a rented P.O. Box.
There are two sides to every
story, however. In the case of access to information about recently deceased
individuals - how is the information available from the SSA any different than
information that can be readily obtained through published obituaries or even
from browsing around a cemetery? Birth records can be easily obtained in most
states by filling out a form and sending in the required payment. Even the
states with laws which require you to be related to the individual in question
usually only require your signature attesting to the fact to release the
document. This information is public and readily available to anyone who goes
looking, so is it really fair to blame companies who place this data on the
Internet?
MyFamily.com received many
phone calls from California citizens concerned about their privacy and,
according to Chief Marketing Officer Craig Sherman, decided to take the records
offline pending further discussions with the California Senate Privacy
Committee, the Senators closely involved in the issue and the customers of
Ancestry.com and RootsWeb.com. California Governor, Gray Davis, has
ordered the California
Department of Health and Human Services to stop releasing state birth and death
records for 45 days while state officials review the circumstances under which
such information sharing is permissible.
The California birth index has been sold to at least 9 other companies over the
past year, however, and is still available online at
http://www.vitalsearch-ca.com/gen/ca/_vitals/cabirthm.htm.
In an unrelated move, several
other popular U.S. Web sites for genealogists have also had their access cut off
this week, including:
-
USGS
Geographic Names Information Server - Information on over 2,000,000
places, features, and areas in the US. (This site has been allowed back online
because it also provides access to critical public safety information
including warning systems for natural disasters such as earthquakes and
floods).
-
Bureau of Land Management Government
Land Office - A searchable database of over 2,000,000 pre-1908 Federal
land title records for the 30 Public Land States
-
Civil War Soldiers and Sailors System
- this site, hosted by the National Park Service, includes a searchable
database which contains basic facts about servicemen who served on both sides
during the Civil War.
The sites have been temporarily
taken down by the order of U.S. District Judge Royce C. Lamberth, as part of a
long-running court case, in order to
protect several government-managed American Indian trust fund accounts from
outside hackers. See
Key Interior
Web Sites Ordered Offline by U.S. Government Info Guide, Robert Longley for
more information and further updates.
Voice Your Opinion on This
Issue:
- I think that the removal of the
vital records from RootsWeb is a case of locking the door after the burglars
have left...Government records are open to the
public under the freedom of information act so all it takes is a little research
to find out almost anything that you wish to know. Yes, limiting the general
public's access to certain years might slow down some of the identity theft
but I think it would take much tighter security to actually stop it.
--From NancyHOST, About Genealogy Forum
Tell Us How You Feel!
- MyFamily.com, parent company of Ancestry.com and RootsWeb.com, is
collecting comments from individuals via email and through polls running on
their Web sites. They have also added a special voice mailbox for comments on
this issue which can be reached through their main headquarters phone number
at 1 (800) 262-3787 or 1 (801) 705-7625 for individuals outside of the U.S.
- Write, call or send an email to your State senator expressing your
opinions on the issue. This is especially important for residents of the
affected states.
Contact Your
State Senator
|